HistWar
HistWar (international zone) => Communities => MODs => Discussion démarrée par: Darsh le 27 juin 2010, 14:43:03 pm
-
Poster vos idées pour les futurs mods!
Post your ideas for the futur mods!
-
I do not follow the battle with 3d but almost exclusively with F2.
Only in replay watch in F3 but the battle is the past.
This is a very pity because lose important stages of the battle the most beautiful, sounds etc.
I do not know how would split the screen into two parts one with map F2 and other with F3 in very high resolution, for me would be the only way to follow the 3d.
-
A mod to change interface would be cool,
For example we could have the historical pictures of each generals with the unit pictures to take the place of the actual icones on the interface.
-
that's really sound great your idea to have the map F2 visio with the 3d view in the same screen.
My be one quater of the screen (left top) would be sufficient to handle the order and to have the 3d view.
-
that's really sound great your idea to have the map F2 visio with the 3d view in the same screen.
My be one quater of the screen (left top) would be sufficient to handle the order and to have the 3d view.
Agree/d'accord!
-
Bonjour Monsieurs,
This is a BIG proposition .... maybe should be a patch ... carbine fire from stationary cavalry close to enemy units ( i.e. when cavalry does not charge home, etc.) ... very complicated , I'm sure ... but happened quite frequently ...
Cordialement, DoE
-
Diffrent periods.
The easiest would be Seven years war, a lot of uniforms to change, but only a little codeing to change the way the battles are fought.
Then you have the American War of Independence, to do that you would first and formost need to change from 1:10 to 1:1 figure scales as the battles are so small.
Most units were only 200-400 soldiers, and you had much fewer units to, the biggest battles of the war was 30 000 strong, something the game can easly handle. and most were less then 15 000.
After that you have War of spanish succesion, here you have to change quite alot, in coding to change gameplay, but the uniforms are simple, most used the same type.
The realy had ones to do would be Great Northen war and 30 years war. here you have pikemen, and I'm not sure it's even possible to code that into the game, here to you could have 1:1 scale as most battles were less then 50 0000 soldiers
-
I do not know how would split the screen into two parts one with map F2 and other with F3 in very high resolution, for me would be the only way to follow the 3d.
If this requires hard work, a dual-monitor possible with the commands for the map F2?
-
Would it be possible to Dual Monitor showing 2D on one monitor and 3D on the other? Probably not, but it would be fantastic if it were possible.
-
Or like the supreme commander serie, you could use the mouse scroll system to swith between the battle map and the 2d map.
-
I rethink with dual monitor is not possible.
With switch is not much different how now , F6 or F5 over icon, surely faster is another way to think.
Perhaps 3d in trasparency on the map 2d with switch Darsh method to increase or decrease transparency ? (very similar to Darsh proposition)
Perhaps better is half screen with 2d and 3d.
-
Hi.
maybe a small 2d map in the corner will do,,,,,,
-
Without need of poll
Not considering the technical aspects ,to facilitate follow 3d together 2d during battle, between these options for now:
1)No add new visual (equivalent to too few post)
2)use the mouse scroll system to switch between the battle map and the 2d map
3) 3d in transparency on the map 2d with scroll system to increase or decrease transparency of 3d.
4)2d in one quarter of the screen (left top) in high resolution and 3d.
5)split screen with 2d (half screen) and 3d (half screen)
I choose 5
Thank Flea, for vote Bibouba idea (post #3)
Post your opinions or ideas.Thank in advance
-
Situation for now
option 4 -> vote 3/4 (Flea,Bibouba,Darsh)
option 5 -> vore 1/4 (Alfiere)
It is right Darsh?
-
Option 5 for me, Alfy. But I still like the idea of Dual monitors, one 2D and one 3D.
-
Ok Ajle
Situation for now
option 4 -> vote 3/5 (Flea,Bibouba,Darsh)
option 5 -> vore 2/5 (Alfiere,Ajlewisbrookes)
It is right option 4 Darsh ?
-
All good ideas!
I would also like to see armies from the Revolutionary Wars and more terrain features/variety.
-
Petrus58 i do not understand,vote a option which?
-
1)No add new visual (equivalent to too few post)
2)use the mouse scroll system to switch between the battle map and the 2d map
3) 3d in transparency on the map 2d with scroll system to increase or decrease transparency of 3d.
4)2d in one quarter of the screen (left top) in high resolution and 3d.
5)split screen with 2d (half screen) and 3d (half screen)
I like option 5 best - but only if it is optional and can be turned on and off. The two maps will be very small !!!!!.
-
Ok Gunner24
Situation for now
option 4 -> vote 3/6 (Flea,Bibouba,Darsh)
option 5 -> vore 3/6 (Alfiere,Ajlewisbrookes,Gunner24)
Gunner24 (is add new visual F ? , F2 and F3 standard must remain !! is not nothing)
The situation with option 4 or 5 should be (F? new visual to follow 2d and 3d hoping the view is good with commands of F2 to select unit to view also in 3d (listen the sound also di 3d), F2 to give orders in fullscreen,F3 to view actions in fullscreen etc)
Of course, then JMM decide , it is only a proposition.
-
Option 4 or 5 for me :D
-
Ok Stoppelhopser
Situation for now
option 4 -> vote 3.5/7
option 5 -> vore 3.5/7
-
I am not a expert to manage images.
This is a try to visualize 50% screen of map e 50% of 3d. (there is some distorsion of icons that i do not know how improve)
Days following will try to visualize 25% of screen with map over 3d
-
really looks nice. I think that you ve try 1/3 for the 2dmap and the other par for the 3d. We have to maximize the 3d version.
-
This is a try with about 30% of map
If you save image with name and use for some minutes how background of desktop have a better idea of result.
-
looks better for me.
-
Yes i agree, map without icons with distorsion but perhaps little?Mahh
This combined view is enough to follow either map and 3d.
Sufficient the commands active on the map to select unit to view also in 3d (with fixed angle behind the unit ,maybe with commands + and - to increase or decrease the zoom) and with sound of battle.
To give orders we can use F2 , to view actions of the battle etc. F3 how now.
For the future ,but there are few votes , it seems that the idea was not much interest.
-
I like the 30% map. It would especially be nice if the inset could be "ghosted" or made solid like in your pic...
anvil
-
I rethink with dual monitor is not possible.
Perhaps better is half screen with 2d and 3d.
Certainly a stupid question only for curiosity.
But if a player has 2 computer connected over internet for to play a multiplayer where choose the same army and maybe in future with special possibiliy also to play against IA he could has a monitor with 2d and the other with 3d or some problem for IP or for key?
-
Option 4 for me :mrgreen:
-
Ok kiva
Situation for now
option 4 -> vote 4.5/8
option 5 -> vore 3.5/8
-
Now i am playing Alternate PBEM.
I enjoy play Alternate,seems nearly to play a MP of 15 minutes.(for 2 players)
Only for gentleman,necessary agreement for do not watch opponent orders.
For me MP is too long to play, i prefer this.
When i receive the file from my opponent,i watch replay with map F2,then i play my 15 minutes with map F2 and send to file.
Having the sav file and not problem to load it , i watch replay of last 1/2 hour (15 minuts of my opponent and my 15 minutes) in 3d in fullscreen everytime i want.(while waiting reply my opponent)
Playing so,for me is not much necessary this proposition,also considering the great work for team.
Then i remove my vote.
Situation for now
option 4 -> vote 4.5/7
option 5 -> vore 2.5/7
-
Bonjour je prend cette page avec un peu de retard.
Pour moi, option 4 ... ;)
-
ok Belliard
Situation for now
option 4 -> vote 5.5/8
option 5 -> vore 2.5/8